⚠️ Disclaimer: This case study is based on publicly available sources and our independent research. We are not tax professionals or legal experts. For advice specific to your situation especially involving customs, international trade, or equine transport we strongly recommend consulting a licensed tax advisor, customs broker, or legal professional.
Introduction and Background
In late March 2025, the U.S. horse industry was jolted by news of a proposed 25% tariff on most goods imported from Canada and Mexico an unprecedented move under the long-standing North American free trade agreements. What made the announcement especially alarming was that live horses were included in the scope of the tariffs. This meant that sport horses, breeding stock, and even horses crossing the border temporarily for competition or breeding purposes could suddenly face significant import fees.
For an industry built on cross-border movement, the news came as a shock. For decades, horses have enjoyed duty-free treatment under NAFTA and later the USMCA. Whether traveling for competitions, breeding, sales, or training, horses moved freely between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico with little concern for tariffs or customs costs. That ease of movement has been a cornerstone of the North American equestrian economy.
The sudden shift tied not to horse-related concerns but to broader U.S. efforts to combat illegal fentanyl trafficking and migration upended that sense of stability. The government invoked emergency economic powers to justify the sweeping trade action, catching many in the horse world off guard.
What followed was a two-week period of uncertainty, financial anxiety, and rapid mobilization. Industry stakeholders on both sides of the border scrambled to interpret the policy, analyze the potential economic fallout, and launch a coordinated lobbying effort aimed at protecting the free movement of horses across North America.
The New Tariffs: Scope and Rationale
Originally set for February and later delayed to April 2, 2025, the proposed tariffs called for a sweeping 25% import tax on nearly all goods entering the U.S. from Canada and Mexico. This included agricultural products, manufacturing goods and notably, horses. The scope of the proposal was broad: purebred sport horses, racehorses, breeding stock, and even leisure or pleasure horses would all fall under the tariff each time they crossed into the U.S.
Importantly, the tariff was not limited to horse sales. Even horses traveling temporarily for competitions or breeding could be subject to the 25% levy. While owners might be eligible to reclaim the cost upon re-export, the upfront financial burden was significant. A tariff of this magnitude effectively increased the cost of transporting a horse into the U.S. by one-quarter, raising serious concerns about the impact on individual owners and the broader equine industry.
The Political Context
The tariffs were not rooted in any equine-related policy issue. Rather, they were part of a broader political maneuver. The U.S. President at the time, Donald Trump, invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), citing national security concerns linked to cross-border fentanyl trafficking and illegal migration. In effect, the horse industry and countless others became entangled in a geopolitical strategy that used economic pressure to influence unrelated international policies.
Canada, the U.S.’s largest trading partner, was swept up in the blanket approach. The 25% rate was intentionally high, recalling tactics from past trade disputes and designed to force a reaction from neighboring governments. Canada responded by preparing retaliatory tariffs on $30 billion worth of U.S. goods, including steel, aluminum, machinery, and potentially agricultural and equine products.
Timing and Industry Impact
What made the proposed tariff especially damaging was its timing. It coincided with two of the busiest periods for horse movement across the border: spring competition season and the peak of breeding season. Horses were not exempt as livestock or sporting animals unlike in many previous trade measures. They were simply grouped under “most goods,” despite the fact that their movements are often temporary, and they are not commercial commodities in the traditional sense.
The implications were far-reaching. As one Canadian breeder put it, “It’s all breeds show horses, ponies for kids, draft horses every kind will be impacted.” The tariff didn’t discriminate by discipline or use; it threatened to destabilize a highly specialized, traditionally tariff-free sector.
In short, the horse industry became an unintended casualty of a broader political strategy. The proposal placed a significant financial strain on a niche market that depends on seamless cross-border movement, raising alarm across the entire North American equine community.
.Confusion and Uncertainty at the Border
From the beginning, the proposed tariffs were steeped in confusion. The policy timeline shifted multiple times first set for February 4, then March 4, and eventually pushed to April 2. This constantly changing deadline left horse owners, breeders, and shippers unsure what rules might apply at any given moment.
The scope of the tariffs was also unclear. As late as the final days of March, there was still no official confirmation on whether live horses would be included. Mixed messages from government sources only deepened the uncertainty. Some communications suggested all Canadian imports would be affected, while others hinted at possible exemptions. Media reports summarized the situation with phrases like “may or may not include live horses,” leaving the industry grasping for clarity.
Owners and shipping companies reported conflicting information from authorities. Under normal trade procedures, many horses shipped between Canada and the U.S. are declared at a low baseline customs value typically around $2,500 per horse using standard codes for breeding or sporting animals. Initially, some professionals assumed the tariff would apply to this declared value, which would be inconvenient but manageable.
However, others raised concerns that customs might instead base the tariff on a horse’s actual market value, which for a sport horse could reach six figures. The American Horse Council eventually clarified that tariffs would be based on fair market value, not the declared purchase price alone. For example, if a horse had recently sold for $10,000 even if technically declared at $1a tariff would be assessed on the higher amount. This created concern that insurance appraisals, sale records, or even online advertisements could be used as evidence of value at the border, making it harder to minimize the cost.
Temporary imports were another area of confusion. Typically, horses entering the U.S. for a short stay such as a Canadian show jumper spending the winter season in Florida can be admitted under a Temporary Import Bond or an ATA Carnet, allowing for duty-free entry as long as they return home within a specified time.
While some U.S. officials indicated that these tools would remain valid and allow for tariff-free temporary entries, Canadian guidance contradicted this. Canadian authorities stated that the 25% tariff would apply each time a horse crossed the border, with refunds possible only if the horse returned home within 30 days. This lack of alignment between countries caused widespread uncertainty. Shippers, trainers, and Olympic-level competitors were left without reliable answers as they planned high-value international trips.
The impact of this uncertainty was felt across the industry in late March. Some Canadian owners rushed to bring horses home before the April 2 deadline. Others postponed trips altogether, hoping for more clarity. During a brief period in early March when the tariff was briefly implemented before being paused confusion at the border reached a breaking point.
Breeding operations were particularly affected. Several shipments of frozen semen were suddenly taxed 25%, with the tariff calculated based on the stallion’s advertised stud fee. Courier services were warned at the border that horses or equine products would be charged the full duty, forcing at least one Canadian stud farm to cancel all deliveries to U.S. clients during that time. Reproduction-focused businesses, a niche sector, scrambled to recover costs or communicate changes to their customers.
These brief but impactful disruptions highlighted the lack of consistent information. Even customs officials seemed uncertain, with inconsistent enforcement and evolving interpretations of the rules. As one representative from the American Horse Council put it, the group had been “nationally unsuccessful at getting questions answered through customs and border patrol,” a troubling reality for those trying to navigate cross-border operations.
In the final days before April 2, many in the horse industry were left making high-stakes decisions whether to ship now or delay, whether to invest in temporary bonds or avoid cross-border travel altogether all without firm guidance. The experience underscored the need for clearer communication in future trade discussions and showed just how vulnerable specialized industries can be when policy changes outpace information.
Economic Implications and Potential Impact
Economic Risks: What a 25% Tariff Could Have Meant for the Horse Industry
Despite lingering uncertainty, there was no doubt within the industry that the stakes were high. A proposed 25% tariff on horses and horse-related goods had the potential to significantly disrupt the North American horse economy. Analysts and industry leaders quickly identified several key areas of impact:
Cross-Border Horse Sales
Each year, a substantial number of Canadian-bred horses are sold to U.S. buyers, including both Thoroughbreds and Standardbreds. These transactions occur through auctions and private sales. In 2024 alone, Canadian breeders sold 268 yearlings at U.S. auctions, generating approximately $12.4 million in sales. This included 157 Thoroughbred yearlings sold primarily in Kentucky and New York for over $7.6 million, and 110 Standardbred yearlings bringing in around $4.8 million.
A 25% tariff on these transactions would have added roughly $3.1 million in extra costs, significantly impacting both sellers and buyers. Canadian breeders would face reduced profits, while American buyers might be discouraged from participating. Industry experts warned this added cost could be a tipping point, making many of these transactions financially unviable.
Breeding and Stud Fees
Breeding operations were among the most vulnerable to disruption. The Thoroughbred and sport horse industries rely heavily on cross-border breeding, with Canadian mares frequently traveling to Kentucky to access top-tier stallions. In the Standardbred and sport horse sectors, the shipment of cooled or frozen semen across borders is also common practice.
According to industry data, about 36% of Canadian Thoroughbred foals born in 2023 were sired by stallions based in the U.S., representing approximately $9 million in stud fees. A 25% tariff on mare shipments or semen imports would effectively tax reproduction itself. For example, an Ontario breeder sending a $100,000 mare to Kentucky could face a $25,000 upfront charge or bond at the border. Even importing a single $1,000 semen dose could incur a $250 tariff.
These added costs could force breeders to abandon cross-border matings or pass the expense along to buyers, threatening the financial sustainability of many breeding programs.
Sport and Competition Horses
The sport horse circuit in North America is deeply integrated, with frequent movement of horses between Canada, the U.S., and Mexico for competitions. Canadian riders often travel to Florida and California for winter shows, while U.S. competitors attend premier events like Spruce Meadows in Alberta.
The proposed tariff would have applied even to horses traveling purely for sport. Owners would be required to place a 25% refundable deposit based on the horse’s value each time they crossed the border. For a horse valued at $50,000, that meant tying up $12,500 until customs paperwork was processed. While the funds could be refunded, the upfront burden was significant and could deter owners from traveling at all.
Industry groups warned that this system would be overwhelming for the average horse owner and would likely lead to a fragmented competition circuit, with fewer international entries and diminished event quality.
Feed, Equipment, and Other Inputs
The tariffs would not have stopped at live horses. Horse-related supplies and equipment, which regularly cross borders, would also be subject to the 25% duty. Canadian farms rely on U.S. imports for certain types of feed, supplements, and bedding materials, while U.S. equestrian operations import tack, equipment, and specialty footing from Canada.
These added costs would ripple across the industry. For example, Canadian imports of saddles and harness from the U.S. were valued at around $20 million in 2024 all of which would have become more expensive. Tack shops and feed suppliers began warning of price hikes and potential shortages. Some Canadian retailers even started sourcing alternatives from Europe, only to encounter higher shipping costs and inconsistent product standards. With inflation already affecting feed prices and hay availability, the added tariff threatened to push many farms to the financial breaking point.
Broader Livestock Implications
While horses were the focus within equestrian circles, the tariffs applied broadly to all live animal imports. The U.S. imports billions of dollars in livestock from Canada annually, including cattle and pigs. A 25% tax on that trade could have increased U.S. meat prices and triggered broader retaliatory actions in agriculture.
Though horses represent a small share of total trade by volume, they carry significant cultural and economic value within their niche. Unlike commodity livestock, tariffs on horses affect individual transactions, many of which represent six-figure investments. The proposed rules served as a reminder that no industry is too small or specialized to be caught up in the consequences of global trade disputes.
A Vulnerable Market at a Breaking Point
Taken together, the potential effects of a 25% tariff were wide-ranging and severe. Every aspect of the horse industry from sales and breeding to competition and care stood to be impacted. The added financial strain risked pushing already thin margins into unsustainable territory.
As one Ontario breeder put it, “The divide is already extreme between what buyers can afford and what breeders can produce a foal for. Tariffs are likely the last straw for many.” There was a genuine fear that if the tariffs went into effect, some breeders and small businesses would be forced to exit the industry entirely.
Stakeholder Responses and Strategies
A Coordinated Response: How the Horse Industry Mobilized Against Tariff Threats
When the horse industry faced a serious threat from proposed tariffs in early 2025, stakeholders across North America acted quickly and decisively. In the brief two-week window between the initial announcement and the policy’s expected implementation, the sector launched a wide-ranging campaign of advocacy, education, and emergency planning.
Industry Organizations in the U.S.
In the United States, the American Horse Council (AHC) and U.S. Equestrian Federation (USEF) led the charge. They focused on two main tasks: informing the equestrian community and engaging with government officials. Both organizations hosted webinars, issued memos, and created guidance materials explaining how horse owners could navigate the potential tariff landscape.
A key part of their outreach was educating the community about customs tools that could help reduce financial exposure. The AHC promoted the use of Temporary Importation Bonds (TIBs) and ATA Carnets tools often used by professional shipping agents, but unfamiliar to many individual horse owners. A TIB would allow a horse to enter the U.S. temporarily with a refundable bond equal to the tariff amount, avoiding a permanent tax as long as the horse left the country within a specified timeframe. ATA Carnets, often referred to as "merchandise passports," offered another option for duty-free, temporary entries of competition horses, typically valid for up to a year.
USEF kept its members informed and helped clarify that while horses often qualify for exemptions, proper documentation or temporary deposits might still be required. Their coordinated efforts helped ease confusion and prevent disruptions, particularly at major events. By late March, many Canadian participants at the Winter Equestrian Festival in Florida were aware of their options and prepared accordingly.
Industry Organizations in Canada
On the Canadian side, industry groups like Standardbred Canada and the Canadian Thoroughbred Horse Society (CTHS) worked diligently to support breeders and owners. These groups published detailed FAQs and scenarios on their websites to guide members through possible outcomes. Information included whether a tariff would apply depending on a horse's country of birth or how to recover deposits if a horse returned unsold from the U.S.
They also engaged with Canada’s Ministry of Agriculture and border services to seek clarity and share that information with their communities. Equestrian Canada, the national sport federation, encouraged members to submit feedback during the government’s public consultation period. This coordinated input helped ensure horses and breeding stock were strongly represented in the policy discussion and, ultimately, contributed to their exemption from retaliatory tariffs.
Horse Owners and Breeders
At the grassroots level, horse owners and breeders reacted with a mix of alarm and determination. Prominent figures in the industry took to the media to put a human face on the issue. Dave Anderson, president of the CTHS and owner of Anderson Farms, became a vocal advocate, warning that his U.S.-focused sales operation would face hundreds of thousands of dollars in added costs if the tariffs were imposed.
He and others emphasized the broader impact: many Canadian breeders relied on American buyers, and those relationships were suddenly at risk. Some buyers began inserting contract clauses that reduced purchase prices if tariffs were enacted. On social media and in interviews, breeders spoke openly about cancelling U.S. breeding or show plans, and some even warned of a potential boycott if costs became too high. High-profile cases like Canada’s champion filly Moira, who could have faced a seven-figure tariff to compete in the U.S., underscored the stakes. The message to policymakers was clear: even elite participants would be affected, and many were ready to halt cross-border activities altogether.
Horse Transporters and Event Organizers
Transport companies and show organizers also moved quickly to adapt. Major shipping firms worked with customs brokers to streamline documentation and advise clients on how to minimize border delays. While experienced handlers understood how to declare values and file paperwork, smaller operations or private haulers risked complications if unprepared.
Some U.S. show managers explored providing on-site customs support or bonded stabling to ease entry for Canadian competitors. Racing venues on both sides of the border were also concerned. Tracks like Woodbine in Toronto rely on American horses for competitive fields, while Canadian-owned horses often race at U.S. events. As the April 2 deadline approached, some stables reconsidered their travel plans for key spring races, including stops on the Kentucky Derby trail.
Government Engagement
Behind the scenes, government officials in Canada, the U.S., and Mexico were flooded with input from the equestrian community. In Canada, Members of Parliament representing regions with strong equine industries heard directly from concerned constituents. The federal public comment period on tariffs saw many submissions urging exemptions for horses and breeding animals. By late March, officials publicly acknowledged they were reviewing such requests, and indicated a willingness to exclude horses from countermeasures if warranted.
In the U.S., the National Thoroughbred Racing Association (NTRA) led outreach to lawmakers. NTRA President Tom Rooney encouraged members to contact Congress and emphasize the unintended consequences of the proposed policy. Drawing on his own experience in Washington, Rooney stressed that direct constituent feedback could influence decisions even at the highest levels. This grassroots campaign helped ensure the White House was fully aware of the damage the tariffs could cause before they were finalized.
Early Indicators and Market Adjustments
Even in the short period that the tariffs were under serious consideration, the horse market began adapting in real time. Some horse shipments were either expedited to cross the border before any new rules took effect or canceled altogether. Breeders, preparing for the possibility of restricted movement, began making alternative plans such as lining up Canadian-based stallions in case their mares couldn’t be shipped to Kentucky for breeding.
In a show of flexibility and goodwill, a few U.S. stallion farms quietly extended offers to Canadian breeders. These included temporary discounts or “risk-free return” policies, which allowed breeders to delay or cancel stud contracts without penalty if tariffs made cross-border travel impossible. At the same time, American auction houses began exploring remote bidding systems and tax escrow services for Canadian sellers, aiming to ease concerns about bringing yearlings to U.S. sales and potentially losing 25% of the value in import duties.
These quick responses highlighted the industry's adaptability, but they were temporary fixes rather than long-term solutions.
The overall market sentiment was clearly shaken. The mere prospect of tariffs introduced a new layer of financial risk. Some buyers began including contract clauses that reduced the purchase price by 25% if a tariff was ultimately imposed essentially building in a safety net. In Ontario, horse prices at winter auctions reportedly softened, as Canadian buyers alone couldn’t make up for a possible drop in demand from the U.S. The unfavorable exchange rate at the time about 69 cents U.S. for every Canadian dollar further deepened the financial strain. A Canadian seller would face a 25% tariff on U.S. dollar earnings and then convert those funds into a weaker domestic currency, compounding the loss.
On the competitive side, some early-season show entries reflected the uncertainty. Fewer Canadian horses appeared on start lists for spring competitions in the U.S., as owners and trainers waited for clearer guidance. In response, some American event organizers considered adjusting prize money or show formats to keep Canadian participation viable. In a few cases, managers even discussed covering bond costs for winning Canadian riders as an incentive to participate.
These adjustments and offers, while short-term, reflected an industry doing its best to stay flexible and cooperative during a time of uncertainty. The response wasn’t just reactive it showed a collective effort to maintain cross-border ties, even as the rules seemed poised to change at any moment.
Resolution and Aftermath
Fortunately, the worst-case scenario for the horse industry didn’t materialize. In the final hours of negotiations, trade officials reached a solution that protected horses and other livestock from new tariffs. On April 3, 2025, President Trump announced a revised policy: imports from Canada and Mexico that meet USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) requirements would continue to enter the U.S. tariff-free. A White House fact sheet confirmed that USMCA-compliant goods would still receive a 0% tariff meaning horses from Canada or Mexico would remain duty-free, as they had been under existing trade rules.
In practical terms, this decision spared the majority of cross-border horse movements from any new costs. Horses traveling for competition, training, breeding, or returning to their country of origin were not affected. For example, a Canadian sport horse attending a U.S. show, a U.S.-bred racehorse returning from a Canadian event, or a Canadian mare in foal to a Kentucky stallion would not be subject to the proposed 25% tariff. The only horses that could potentially face tariffs were those originating in non-USMCA countries such as a European horse passing through Canada on its way to the U.S. but even that was clarified. If the horse was merely in transit (for example, quarantining in the U.S. before continuing to Canada), it would not be considered a U.S. import.
Canada responded positively to the exemption. Prime Minister Mark Carney confirmed that Canada would follow suit, maintaining free trade for USMCA-compliant goods, including horses. Instead, Canada targeted other sectors with counter-tariffs, focusing on specific U.S. automotive products that didn’t meet USMCA content rules. No new tariffs were placed on horses or agricultural products, effectively preserving the current trade relationship. As a result, American horses could still travel to Canadian events like the Queen’s Plate or Spruce Meadows without new fees, and Canadian horses could continue to enter the U.S. without interruption. Mexico was also not expected to impose any new horse-related tariffs, given the reciprocal U.S. decision and the fact that existing tariffs focused on other issues.
The horse industry responded with relief. In Canada, the Thoroughbred community praised the outcome, calling it “exceptional news” that protected the long-standing and mutually beneficial relationship between Canadian and American breeders and owners. In the U.S., major industry groups such as the American Horse Council and the NTRA quickly notified members that the threat had passed. Horses could continue crossing the border as usual, with no extra costs or bond requirements beyond standard temporary import procedures.
Still, the close call left a lasting impression. Industry stakeholders resolved to stay alert in the future. The situation demonstrated how even a relatively small sector like the horse industry can be deeply impacted by global trade policy decisions. But it also showed the power of rapid, unified advocacy. Industry groups were widely credited with helping policymakers understand the stakes in time to protect cross-border movement.
As a result, communication channels between horse associations and trade officials have been strengthened. There’s now serious discussion about creating a formal “equine trade coalition” to coordinate responses to future threats, including tariffs or regulatory barriers.
Operationally, the episode prompted many within the industry to better understand international customs procedures. Terms like “ATA Carnet” and “Temporary Import Bond” once known only to specialists are now more familiar to horse owners and managers. Some larger stables have begun keeping these documents ready as a safeguard, while others are reassessing how they manage international travel and breeding. Some Canadian breeders, for example, are considering using more domestic stallions to reduce cross-border dependency. On the U.S. side, show organizers are exploring adding Canadian events to their circuits to improve flexibility in case of future disruptions.
The 2025 tariff scare was a significant test for the North American horse industry. It revealed just how interconnected the market is and how quickly the industry can unite when those connections are threatened. Though the crisis was brief, it highlighted how vulnerable niche industries can be to larger trade tensions, and how important it is to remain vigilant.
Most importantly, it reinforced the value of open borders and open markets. From local competitions to international racing, the horse industry thrives on cross-border movement. The situation may have been complex and uncertain at times, but it proved that when the industry works together, it can effectively protect its interests and chart a stronger path forward.
What the 2025 Tariff Proposal Meant for European Horse Imports
While the 2025 U.S. tariff proposal was aimed primarily at goods coming from Canada and Mexico, it raised important questions about how European horse imports might be affectedespecially since many European horses are routed through Canada for quarantine or resale before heading to the U.S.
Under normal trade rules, horses imported directly from Europe into the United States are already subject to standard duties, health protocols, and quarantine requirements. These horses are not protected by the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement), which only applies to trade between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. Fortunately, the 25% tariff proposed in 2025 was not designed to target European goods, so horses flown directly from Europe to the U.S. would not have been impacted by this specific measure unless a separate U.S.-EU trade dispute emerged.
However, complications arose for European horses transiting through Canada or Mexico before entering the U.S. In some cases, customs authorities might have classified a horse’s origin based on where it was last housed or sold, rather than its original country of birth. That meant a European horse residing temporarily in Canada, or sold to a Canadian owner before being exported to the U.S., could potentially be viewed as “Canadian-origin” making it subject to the 25% tariff.
To avoid this, shippers and owners needed to carefully document the horse’s origin and travel status. If the horse was only passing through Canada en route to the U.S., tools like an ATA Carnet (a “passport” for temporary imports) or a Temporary Import Bond (TIB) could be used to declare it as “in transit.” These mechanisms could exempt the horse from tariffs, but they involved extra paperwork and costs and depended on accurate, consistent application by customs officials.
In short, while European horses weren’t the direct target of the 2025 tariffs, any detour through Canada or Mexico added a layer of risk and complexity. Owners and agents needed to work closely with customs brokers to ensure the correct origin status was declared and the appropriate import documents were in place, or risk unexpected costs at the border.
Conclusion
The import tariff situation in spring 2025 served as an unexpected stress test for the North American horse industry. It revealed just how economically interconnected the sector has become—from the $12 million in annual Canadian yearling sales to U.S. buyers, to the growing reliance on U.S. sires in Canadian Thoroughbred pedigrees, to the frequent cross-border movement of horses for competitions.
These ties, rather than becoming liabilities, became strengths. The industry responded swiftly and in unison, prompting action at the highest levels of government. Ultimately, the free flow of horses across the U.S., Canada, and Mexico was preserved.
This episode also exposed how vulnerable specialized industries can be when caught in the crossfire of larger trade disputes. Often overlooked in trade negotiations, the horse industry suddenly found itself at the center of a geopolitical issue. While the disruption was short-lived, it caused real financial strain and forced stakeholders to adjust quickly. It was a stark reminder that, even in an era of international trade agreements, stability cannot be taken for granted.
Moving forward, the U.S. horse industry along with its Canadian and Mexican partners remains alert to potential policy shifts, now better equipped with the experience and networks built during this challenge. As one industry veteran put it, the situation was “clear as mud” at times, but it ultimately showed how powerful unity and advocacy can be in protecting the interests of breeders, sport horse owners, and everyone who depends on an open international horse market.
The industry emerged from this crisis with hard-earned insights and a renewed understanding of just how vital open borders and open markets are from local arenas to major events like the Kentucky Derby.
Sources:
https://www.thoroughbreddailynews.com/how-will-tariffs-against-canada-affect-horse-racing-perhaps-substantially/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CMoira%20would%20have%20been%20hit,Cup%20Filly%20and%20Mare%20Turf
https://horsesport.com/magazine/business/horsepeoples-top-tariff-questions-answered/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CIt%20is%20still%20undetermined%20how,%E2%80%9D
https://www.horsejournals.com/equinews/news/international/impact-tariffs-canadas-equine-industry#:~:text=tariffs,affected%20goods%20is%20available%20here
https://www.thoroughbreddailynews.com/how-will-tariffs-against-canada-affect-horse-racing-perhaps-substantially/#:~:text=the%20Canadian%20tariffs%20for%20purebred,racing%20animals%2C%E2%80%9D%20the%20CTHS%20wrote
https://www.theirishfield.ie/amp/sport-horse/features/feature-tariffs-will-be-the-last-straw-for-breeding-industry-861124
https://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/283211/canadian-breeders-shaken-by-tariff-threats#:~:text=Canadian%20Breeders%20Shaken%20by%20Tariff,before%20he%20could%20be%20penalized
https://www.chronofhorse.com/article/impending-tariffs-may-inflict-big-costs-and-headaches-at-us-border/#:~:text=On%20April%202%2C%20a%2025,like%20hay%2C%20feed%20and%20lumber